Clauson v. New England Insuranc, 00-1543 (2001)
Court: Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Number: 00-1543
Filed: Jul. 28, 2001
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: Indeed, at oral argument, while maintaining that the court's, interpretation was, from its point of view, incorrect, NEIC, also acknowledged that the meaning works, conceding, in, effect, that the reading offered by the district court was, a reasonable response to the language of the policy.
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 00-1543 No. 00-1568 JOHN CLAUSON, Plaintiff, Appellee/Cross-Appellant, v. NEW ENGLAND INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant, Appellant/Cross-Appellee. ERRATA The opinion of this court issued June 22, 2001, is amended as follows: On page 12, lines 16-17, replace “Indeed, NEIC conceded at oral argument that the court's interpretation was reasonable.” with the following: Indeed, at oral argument, while maintaining that the court's interpretation was, from its point of view, incorrect, NEIC also acknowledged that "the meaning works," conceding, in effect, that the reading offered by the district court was a reasonable response to the language of the policy.
Source: CourtListener
