Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Rasten v. Town of Brookline, 00-2480 (2001)

Court: Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Number: 00-2480 Visitors: 2
Filed: Dec. 11, 2001
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: TOWN OF BROOKLINE, ET AL.Selya and Lipez, Circuit Judges.Anina Rasten on brief pro se., George F. Driscoll, Jr., Office of Town Counsel, on brief, for appellees.DECEMBER 4, 2001, Per Curiam.given by the district court.
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION–NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT] United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit Nos. 00-2480 01-1218 ANINA RASTEN, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. TOWN OF BROOKLINE, ET AL., Defendants, Appellees. APPEALS FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. Morris E. Lasker, Senior U.S. District Judge] Before Boudin, Chief Judge, Selya and Lipez, Circuit Judges. Anina Rasten on brief pro se. George F. Driscoll, Jr., Office of Town Counsel, on brief for appellees. DECEMBER 4, 2001 Per Curiam. After due consideration of record and briefs on appeal, we affirm for substantially the reasons given by the district court. Affirmed. Loc. R. 27(c). -2-
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer