Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Cashmere & Camel v. Saks Fifth Avenue, 00-2341 (2002)

Court: Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Number: 00-2341 Visitors: 40
Filed: May 22, 2002
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: Defendants, Appellees.Nothing in this opinion, however, is meant to preclude, defendants from rebutting the presumption of consumer, deception at trial by showing that the labeling did not, actually deceive consumers.
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 00-2341 CASHMERE & CAMEL HAIR MANUFACTURERS INSTITUTE, F/K/A CAMEL HAIR & CASHMERE INSTITUTE OF AMERICA, INC., AND L.W. PACKARD & CO., INC., Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. SAKS FIFTH AVENUE, HARVE BENARD, LTD. AND FILENES BASEMENT, Defendants, Appellees. ERRATA SHEET The opinion of this Court issued on April 1, 2002, is amended as follows: On page 28, line 2: Insert a one-sentence paragraph that reads: "Nothing in this opinion, however, is meant to preclude defendants from rebutting the presumption of consumer deception at trial by showing that the labeling did not actually deceive consumers."
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer