Filed: May 29, 2003
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: STEPHEN GRIFFIN, ET AL.and Lynch, Circuit Judge.Norman Greenberg on brief pro se., James B. Cox, Alison J. Little and Rubin and Rudman, LLP on, brief for appellees Paul Scannell and Frederick Woodward.district court. Perry Educational Ass'n.414 U.S. 218 (1973).
Not for Publication in West’s Federal Reporter
Citation Limited Pursuant to 1st Cir. Loc. R. 32.3
United States Court of Appeals
For the First Circuit
No. 02-1041
NORMAN GREENBERG,
Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
STEPHEN GRIFFIN, ET AL.,
Defendants, Appellees.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
[Hon. George A. O'Toole, Jr., U.S. District Judge]
Before
Selya, Circuit Judge,
Stahl, Senior Circuit Judge,
and Lynch, Circuit Judge.
Norman Greenberg on brief pro se.
Joseph G. Donnellan on brief for appellee Stephen Griffin.
James B. Cox, Alison J. Little and Rubin and Rudman, LLP on
brief for appellees Paul Scannell and Frederick Woodward.
May 28, 2003
Per Curiam. After carefully considering the record and briefs
on appeal, we affirm for substantially the reasons stated by the
district court.
The appellant made no showing of any constitutional
violation. West v. Atkins, 487 U.S. 42 (1988)(42 U.S.C. § 1983
protects only federally-secured rights). First Amendment rights
are subject to reasonable regulation. Among other problems, the
appellant fails to develop any adequate argument on appeal that
banning him from the campus was unreasonable, given his behavior.
Widmar v. Vincent,
454 U.S. 263 (1981); Perry Educational Ass'n. v.
Perry Local Educators' Ass'n.,
460 U.S. 37 (1983). Similarly, he
makes no showing that his rights under the Fourth Amendment were
violated. The arrest was supported by probable cause and the
search was incident to a lawful arrest. United States v. Robinson,
414 U.S. 218 (1973). Finally, his attempt to suggest a factual
dispute is meritless.
Affirmed. Loc. R. 27 (c).
-2-
