Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Hearn, 02-2648 (2003)

Court: Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Number: 02-2648 Visitors: 2
Filed: Jul. 08, 2003
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Defendant, Appellant.Lynch and Lipez, Circuit Judges.Joseph Hearn on brief pro se.Peter E. Papps, First Assistant U.S. Attorney, and Thomas P., Colantuono, United States Attorney, on Motion for Summary, Affirmance and Memorandum in Support for appellee.Per Curiam.
USCA1 Opinion


Not for Publication in West's Federal Reporter

Citation Limited Pursuant to 1st Cir. Loc. R. 32.3

United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit






No. 02-2648

UNITED STATES,



Appellee,



v.



JOSEPH L. HEARN,



Defendant, Appellant.




APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE



[Hon. Steven J. McAuliffe, U.S. District Judge]




Before


Boudin, Chief Judge,

Lynch and Lipez, Circuit Judges.






Joseph Hearn on brief pro se.

Peter E. Papps, First Assistant U.S. Attorney, and Thomas P. Colantuono, United States Attorney, on Motion for Summary Affirmance and Memorandum in Support for appellee.







July 8, 2003






Per Curiam. Upon a careful review of the judgment dismissing appellant's motion to modify his sentence, and in light of the record and the arguments on appeal, the judgment of dismissal is affirmed.

Alternatively, construing appellant's brief as a request for leave to file a second or successive habeas petition, we deny the request for failure to satisfy the statutory criteria.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer