Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

03-1141 (2004)

Court: Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Number: 03-1141 Visitors: 24
Filed: May 04, 2004
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: 373 F.3d 1, Jorge J. MAYMO-MELENDEZ, Plaintiff, Appellee, v.Julio ALVAREZ-RAMIREZ;, Ivette M. Berrios Hernandez, Eileen Landron Guardiola, Eduardo A. Vera-Ramirez, Landron Vera, LLP, Guaynabo, PR, Salvador J. Antonetti-Stutts, Pietrantoni, Mendez Alvarez, San Juan, PR, for Defendants-Appellants.

373 F.3d 1

Jorge J. MAYMO-MELENDEZ, Plaintiff, Appellee,
v.
Julio ALVAREZ-RAMIREZ; Ricardo Pacheco-Pacheco; Irba Cruz-De-Batista, Defendants, Appellants,
Jane Doe 02CV2001; Conjugal Partnership Alvarez-Doe; Jane Doe 02CV2001-2; Conjugal Partnership Pacheco-Doe; John Doe 02CV2001; Conjugal Partnership Doe-Cruz; Conjugal Partnership Alves-Doe; Juan Alves-Rueda, Defendants.

No. 03-1141.

United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.

May 4, 2004.

Charles A. Cuprill-Hernandez, Old San Juan, PR, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Ivette M. Berrios Hernandez, Eileen Landron Guardiola, Eduardo A. Vera-Ramirez, Landron & Vera, LLP, Guaynabo, PR, Salvador J. Antonetti-Stutts, Pietrantoni, Mendez & Alvarez, San Juan, PR, for Defendants-Appellants.

Before BOUDIN, Chief Judge, TORRUELLA, SELYA, LYNCH, LIPEZ and HOWARD, Circuit Judges.

ORDER OF COURT

1

The panel of judges that rendered the decision in this case having voted to deny the petition for rehearing and the suggestion for the holding of a rehearing en banc having been carefully considered by the judges of the Court in regular active service and a majority of said judges not having voted to order that the appeal be reheard by the Court en banc,

2

It is ordered that the petition for rehearing and the suggestion for rehearing en banc be denied.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer