Filed: Mar. 30, 2004
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: Cyr and Stahl, Senior Circuit Judges.Christine M. Varad on brief pro se.Assistant Attorney General, on brief for appellee.March 30, 2004, Per Curiam.Edward Barshak, Varad v. Barshak, 261 F. Supp.the court's discussion of the facts indicates, 261 F. Supp.48-52, these claims were meritless.
Not for Publication in West's Federal Reporter
Citation Limited Pursuant to lst Cir. Loc. R. 32.3
United States Court of Appeals
For the First Circuit
No. 03-1779
CHRISTINE M. VARAD,
Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
EDWARD J. BARSHAK,
Defendant, Appellee.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
[Hon. Robert B. Collings, U.S. Magistrate Judge]
Before
Torruella, Circuit Judge,
Cyr and Stahl, Senior Circuit Judges.
Christine M. Varad on brief pro se.
Thomas F. Reilly, Attorney General, and Maite A. Parsi,
Assistant Attorney General, on brief for appellee.
March 30, 2004
Per Curiam. This pro se appellant, Christine Varad,
appeals from a decision granting summary judgment for appellee,
Edward Barshak, Varad v. Barshak, 261 F. Supp. 2d 47 (D. Mass.
2003). After careful review of the parties' contentions in light
of the record, we affirm the decision on the Title II claim under
the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. ยง 12132,
substantially for the reasons stated in the district court's
thorough opinion. The appellee apparently concedes that the
court's rulings on Varad's remaining claims were erroneous and
argues that they should be rejected on the merits. We agree. As
the court's discussion of the facts
indicates, 261 F. Supp. 2d at
48-52, these claims were meritless.
Affirmed.
-2-
