Jones v. Boston Housing, 04-1961 (2005)
Court: Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Number: 04-1961
Visitors: 10
Filed: Jan. 31, 2005
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: BOSTON HOUSING AUTHORITY, ET AL.Defendants, Appellees.Circuit Judges.Samuel Jones on brief pro se., Jay S. Koplove on brief for appellee, Boston Housing, Authority.January 31, 2005, Per Curiam.court in its orders dated November 28, 2003 and June 18, 2004.
Not for Publication in West's Federal Reporter
Citation Limited Pursuant to 1st Cir. Loc. R. 32.3
United States Court of Appeals
For the First Circuit
No. 04-1961
SAMUEL JONES,
Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
BOSTON HOUSING AUTHORITY, ET AL.,
Defendants, Appellees.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
[Hon. Reginald C. Lindsay, U.S. District Judge]
Before
Selya, Lynch and Lipez,
Circuit Judges.
Samuel Jones on brief pro se.
Jay S. Koplove on brief for appellee, Boston Housing
Authority.
January 31, 2005
Per Curiam. After allowing this pro se appellant to
proceed in forma pauperis and giving him an opportunity to be
heard, the district court dismissed the complaint, which sought
to reopen a different litigation. 28 U.S.C. ยง
1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (allowing district court to dismiss an in
forma pauperis complaint failing to state a claim "at any
time). After careful review of the record and appellate
briefs, we affirm, essentially for the reasons given by the
court in its orders dated November 28, 2003 and June 18, 2004.
Affirmed.
-2-
Source: CourtListener