Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Napier v. F, 05-1503 (2006)

Court: Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Number: 05-1503 Visitors: 12
Filed: Aug. 18, 2006
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: On page 6 of the slip opinion, the sentence beginning The, magistrate judge's ruling was also erroneous...
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit Nos. 05-1503, 05-2545 JAMES NAPIER, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. F/V DEESIE, INC., Defendant, Appellee. ERRATA SHEET The opinion of this Court issued on July 11, 2006, is amended as follows: On page 6 of the slip opinion, the sentence beginning "The magistrate judge's ruling was also erroneous..." should now read as follows: The magistrate judge's ruling was also erroneous because Napier, in a report that was filed with his opposition to Deesie's amended motion for summary judgment, provided evidence that he took aspirin and Motrin, an allegation that should have been taken as true by the magistrate judge for purposes of deciding upon the summary judgment motion.
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer