Filed: Oct. 30, 2008
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: Defendants, Appellants. United States v. Jiménez-Beltre, 440 F.3d 514, 519 (1st, Cir. Nevertheless, a defendant who attempts to, brand a within-the-range sentence as unreasonable must carry a, heavy burden. United States v. Van Anh, 523 F.3d 43, 59 (1st, Cir.
United States Court of Appeals
For the First Circuit
Nos. 06-1283
07-1001
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Appellee,
v.
DAVID MORALES-MACHUCA,
QUESTER STERLING-SUÁREZ,
Defendants, Appellants.
ERRATA SHEET
The opinion of this Court issued on October 17, 2008, is
corrected as follows:
On p. 25, lines 4-11: Delete sentence beginning with "A
sentence" and ending with "original)." and substitute with:
"We review sentences for reasonableness regardless of whether
they fall inside or outside the applicable Guideline sentencing
range. United States v. Jiménez-Beltre, 440 F.3d 514, 519 (1st
Cir. 2006) (en banc). Nevertheless, "a defendant who attempts to
brand a within-the-range sentence as unreasonable must carry a
heavy burden." United States v. Van Anh,
523 F.3d 43, 59 (1st
Cir. 2008) (citing United States v. Pelletier,
469 F.3d 194, 204
(1st Cir. 2006))."
