Mazariegos-Paiz v. Holder, 12-1382 (2013)
Court: Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Number: 12-1382
Visitors: 6
Filed: Oct. 30, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: The, government has not raised any question of either waiver or, forfeiture, see United States v. Olano, 507 U.S. 725, 733-34 (1993), (discussing those doctrines), and we take no view as to their, applicability or operation in judicial review of agency orders.
United States Court of Appeals
For the First Circuit
No. 12-1382
HENRY MAZARIEGOS-PAIZ,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., ATTORNEY GENERAL,
Respondent.
ERRATA SHEET
The opinion of this Court issued on October 25, 2013 is
corrected as follows:
On page 2, line 9, Footnote 1 is to be added at the end of the
word "them." as follows:
We caution that we deal here exclusively with the
jurisdictional issue of exhaustion of administrative remedies. The
government has not raised any question of either waiver or
forfeiture, see United States v. Olano, 507 U.S. 725, 733-34 (1993)
(discussing those doctrines), and we take no view as to their
applicability or operation in judicial review of agency orders.
Every other footnote thereafter should be renumbered
accordingly.
Source: CourtListener
