United States v. Rich, 13-1995 (2015)
Court: Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Number: 13-1995
Visitors: 2
Filed: Feb. 02, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Defendant, Appellant.On p.3, l.11, the word no should be substituted for the word, know.Appellate courts should not write at length to no other end, than to hear their own words resonate.
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 13-1995 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. GERALD T. RICH, JR., Defendant, Appellant. ERRATA SHEET The opinion of this Court issued on January 12, 2015 is corrected as follows: On p.3, l.11, the word "no" should be substituted for the word "know". The sentence, therefore, reads as follows: "Appellate courts should not write at length to no other end than to hear their own words resonate."
Source: CourtListener
