Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United Producing Company, Inc., a Corporation v. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company, a Corporation, 4703 (1954)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Number: 4703 Visitors: 23
Filed: Sep. 08, 1954
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: 215 F.2d 958 UNITED PRODUCING COMPANY, Inc., a corporation, Appellant, v. PANHANDLE EASTERN PIPE LINE COMPANY, a corporation, Appellee. No. 4703. United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit. September 8, 1954. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Kansas; Delmas C. Hill, Judge. William J. Holloway, Jr., and V. P. Crowe, Oklahoma City, Okl. (Embry, Johnson, Crowe, Tolbert & Boxley, Oklahoma City, Okl., H. W. Stubbs, and Stubbs & Wesley, Ulysses, Kan., on the brief), fo
More

215 F.2d 958

UNITED PRODUCING COMPANY, Inc., a corporation, Appellant,
v.
PANHANDLE EASTERN PIPE LINE COMPANY, a corporation, Appellee.

No. 4703.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

September 8, 1954.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Kansas; Delmas C. Hill, Judge.

William J. Holloway, Jr., and V. P. Crowe, Oklahoma City, Okl. (Embry, Johnson, Crowe, Tolbert & Boxley, Oklahoma City, Okl., H. W. Stubbs, and Stubbs & Wesley, Ulysses, Kan., on the brief), for appellant.

Mark H. Adams, Wichita, Kan., and William I. Robinson, Tulsa, Okl. (Edward H. Lange, Kansas City, Mo., and Adams, Jones, Robinson & Manka, Wichita, Kan., on the brief), for appellee.

Before BRATTON, MURRAH and PICKETT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

The case of Columbian Fuel Corp. v. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co., 176 Kan. 433, 271 P.2d 773, was decided after entry of the judgment herein. On the authority of that case, the judgment is vacated and the cause is remanded.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer