Filed: Jan. 08, 1959
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 263 F.2d 840 SUNRAY MID-CONTINENT OIL COMPANY v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION. No. 5947. United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit. Jan. 8, 1959. Dale E. Doty, Washington, D.C., and M. Darwin Kirk and James C. Denton, Jr., Tulsa, Okl., for petitioner. Willard W. Gatchell, Gen. Counsel, Howard E. Wahrenbrock, Sol., and William W. Ross, Atty., Federal Power Commission, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before BRATTON, Chief Judge, and PICKETT and LEWIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. 1 Petition for re
Summary: 263 F.2d 840 SUNRAY MID-CONTINENT OIL COMPANY v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION. No. 5947. United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit. Jan. 8, 1959. Dale E. Doty, Washington, D.C., and M. Darwin Kirk and James C. Denton, Jr., Tulsa, Okl., for petitioner. Willard W. Gatchell, Gen. Counsel, Howard E. Wahrenbrock, Sol., and William W. Ross, Atty., Federal Power Commission, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before BRATTON, Chief Judge, and PICKETT and LEWIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. 1 Petition for rev..
More
No. 5947.
United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.
Jan. 8, 1959.
Dale E. Doty, Washington, D.C., and M. Darwin Kirk and James C. Denton, Jr., Tulsa, Okl., for petitioner.
Willard W. Gatchell, Gen. Counsel, Howard E. Wahrenbrock, Sol., and William W. Ross, Atty., Federal Power Commission, Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Before BRATTON, Chief Judge, and PICKETT and LEWIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
