Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Wilbert Thomas Arbuckle v. United States, 6099 (1959)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Number: 6099 Visitors: 9
Filed: Mar. 27, 1959
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 268 F.2d 221 Wilbert Thomas ARBUCKLE v. UNITED STATES of America. No. 6099. United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit. March 27, 1959. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma. Paul W. Cress, U. S. Atty., and Erwin A. Cook, Asst. U. S. Atty., Oklahoma City, Okl., for appellee. Before BRATTON, Chief Judge, PICKETT, Circuit Judge, and KNOUS, District Judge. PER CURIAM. 1 Affirmed without written opinion, on the ground that the questions raised in the mot
More

268 F.2d 221

Wilbert Thomas ARBUCKLE
v.
UNITED STATES of America.

No. 6099.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

March 27, 1959.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma.

Paul W. Cress, U. S. Atty., and Erwin A. Cook, Asst. U. S. Atty., Oklahoma City, Okl., for appellee.

Before BRATTON, Chief Judge, PICKETT, Circuit Judge, and KNOUS, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

1

Affirmed without written opinion, on the ground that the questions raised in the motion filed under the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 2255 could only be reviewed by direct appeal.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer