Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

A. N. Spanel v. Ula Mining Corporation. Ula Mining Corporation v. A. N. Spanel, 6559 (1960)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Number: 6559 Visitors: 8
Filed: Nov. 30, 1960
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 287 F.2d 572 A. N. SPANEL et al., v. ULA MINING CORPORATION. ULA MINING CORPORATION v. A. N. SPANEL et al. Nos. 6558, 6559. United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit. Nov. 30, 1960. Modrall, Seymour, Sperling, Roehl & Harris, Albuquerque, N.M., and Lyne, Blanchette, Smith & Shelton, Dallas, Tex., for appellants, and cross-appellees. Dolley, Jessen & Painter, Los Angeles, Cal., and Rodey, Dickason, Sloan, Akin & Robb, Albuquerque, N.M., for appellee and cross-appellant. Before MURRAH, Chief Ju
More

287 F.2d 572

A. N. SPANEL et al.,
v.
ULA MINING CORPORATION.
ULA MINING CORPORATION
v.
A. N. SPANEL et al.

Nos. 6558, 6559.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

Nov. 30, 1960.

Modrall, Seymour, Sperling, Roehl & Harris, Albuquerque, N.M., and Lyne, Blanchette, Smith & Shelton, Dallas, Tex., for appellants, and cross-appellees.

Dolley, Jessen & Painter, Los Angeles, Cal., and Rodey, Dickason, Sloan, Akin & Robb, Albuquerque, N.M., for appellee and cross-appellant.

Before MURRAH, Chief Judge, and BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

1

On joint motion and stipulation of the parties, cause remanded to United States District Court for the District of New Mexico for the entry of a consent settlement decree and judgment.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer