Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Robert Thomas Lingo v. United States, 7328 (1963)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Number: 7328 Visitors: 33
Filed: Jul. 12, 1963
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 320 F.2d 260 Robert Thomas LINGO, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. No. 7328. United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit. July 12, 1963. Thomas T. Crumpacker, Colorado Springs, Colo., for appellant. Phillips Breckinridge, Asst. U.S. Atty., (John M. Imel, U.S. Atty., on the brief), for appellee. Before PICKETT, BREITENSTEIN and HILL, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. 1 A jury found Lingo guilty of a violation of 18 U.S.C. 495 and he was sentenced to a term of five years. The trial cou
More

320 F.2d 260

Robert Thomas LINGO, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 7328.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

July 12, 1963.

Thomas T. Crumpacker, Colorado Springs, Colo., for appellant.

Phillips Breckinridge, Asst. U.S. Atty., (John M. Imel, U.S. Atty., on the brief), for appellee.

Before PICKETT, BREITENSTEIN and HILL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

A jury found Lingo guilty of a violation of 18 U.S.C. 495 and he was sentenced to a term of five years. The trial court denied his application to secure at government expense certain to secure at the transcript of the trial proceedings. The time for appeal has passed and no application for post-conviction relief is panding. The denial of the application was proper. Pearson v. United States, 10 Cir., 313 F.2d 868; Prince v. United States, 10 Cir., 312 F.2d 252.

2

Affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer