Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Bernard E. Leclair v. United States, 8173 (1966)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Number: 8173 Visitors: 9
Filed: Mar. 30, 1966
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 357 F.2d 173 Bernard E. LeCLAIR, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. No. 8173. United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit. Jan. 31, 1966, Rehearing Denied March 30, 1966. C. William Herzog, Denver, Colo., for appellant. Benjamin E. Franklin, Topeka, Kan. (Newell A. George, U.S. Atty., with him on brief), for appellee. Before MURRAH, Chief Judge, and PICKETT and SETH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. 1 After full hearing in this coram nobis proceedings, the trial court found that no pr
More

357 F.2d 173

Bernard E. LeCLAIR, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 8173.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

Jan. 31, 1966, Rehearing Denied March 30, 1966.

C. William Herzog, Denver, Colo., for appellant.

Benjamin E. Franklin, Topeka, Kan. (Newell A. George, U.S. Atty., with him on brief), for appellee.

Before MURRAH, Chief Judge, and PICKETT and SETH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

After full hearing in this coram nobis proceedings, the trial court found that no promises or inducement of any kind was offered or made to petitioner by anyone to induce him to change his plea from not guilty to guilty; that the guilty plea was entered voluntarily and with full knowledge of the consequences. This finding is amply supported in the record, and the judgment of the trial court denying relief is affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer