Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. John M. Reilly, 8707 (1967)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Number: 8707 Visitors: 12
Filed: Mar. 03, 1967
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 373 F.2d 737 UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. John M. REILLY, Appellee. No. 8707. United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit. March 3, 1967. Jack H. Weiner, Washington, D.C. (J. William Doolittle, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., John Quinn, U.S. Atty., and David L. Rose, Attorney, Department of Justice, on the brief), for appellant. Joseph A. Sommer, Santa Fe, N.M. (Thomas F. McKenna, Sr., Santa Fe, N.M., on the brief), for appellee. Before LEWIS and HICKEY, Circuit Judges, and STANLEY, Distri
More

373 F.2d 737

UNITED STATES of America, Appellant,
v.
John M. REILLY, Appellee.

No. 8707.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

March 3, 1967.

Jack H. Weiner, Washington, D.C. (J. William Doolittle, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., John Quinn, U.S. Atty., and David L. Rose, Attorney, Department of Justice, on the brief), for appellant.

Joseph A. Sommer, Santa Fe, N.M. (Thomas F. McKenna, Sr., Santa Fe, N.M., on the brief), for appellee.

Before LEWIS and HICKEY, Circuit Judges, and STANLEY, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

1

This appeal is dismissed. The record shows the dismissal of appellant's complaint but no dismissal of the action or a final judgment in any form. See Mitchell v. Parham, 10 Cir., 345 F.2d 797, and cases cited.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer