Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

State of Colorado Ex Rel. Colorado Attorney General, Duane Woodard, and Cross-Appellee v. Western Paving Construction Co., and Cross-Appellant, 86-1363 (1988)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Number: 86-1363 Visitors: 18
Filed: Mar. 10, 1988
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 841 F.2d 1025 1988-1 Trade Cases 68,003 STATE OF COLORADO ex rel. COLORADO ATTORNEY GENERAL, Duane Woodard, Plaintiff-Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. WESTERN PAVING CONSTRUCTION CO., Defendant-Appellee and Cross-Appellant. Nos. 86-1363, 86-1420. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. March 10, 1988. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Colorado, Alfred A. Arraj, Judge (D.C.Civil Action No. 84-A-1483). David S. Harmon, Asst. Atty. Gen., Antitrust Section (Thom
More

841 F.2d 1025

1988-1 Trade Cases 68,003

STATE OF COLORADO ex rel. COLORADO ATTORNEY GENERAL, Duane
Woodard, Plaintiff-Appellant and Cross-Appellee,
v.
WESTERN PAVING CONSTRUCTION CO., Defendant-Appellee and
Cross-Appellant.

Nos. 86-1363, 86-1420.

United States Court of Appeals,
Tenth Circuit.

March 10, 1988.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Colorado, Alfred A. Arraj, Judge (D.C.Civil Action No. 84-A-1483).

David S. Harmon, Asst. Atty. Gen., Antitrust Section (Thomas P. McMahon, First Asst. Atty. Gen., Chief, Antitrust Section, Duane Woodard, Atty. Gen., Charles B. Howe, Deputy Atty. Gen., and Richard H. Forman, Sol. Gen., with him on the briefs), for plaintiff-appellant.

John Bodner, Jr., Howrey & Simon, Washington, D.C. (Marcia Press Kaplan of Howrey & Simon, Washington, D.C., and B. Lawrence Theis of Walters & Theis, Denver, Colo., with him on the brief), for defendant-appellee.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. of the State of Fla., and Jerome W. Hoffman, Asst. Atty. Gen. of the State of Fla., filed a brief amicus curiae for the State of Fla.

Before HOLLOWAY, Chief Judge, McKAY, LOGAN, SEYMOUR, MOORE, ANDERSON, TACHA and BALDOCK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

The prior judgment of this Court is vacated and the panel opinion of this Court, 833 F.2d 867 (1987), is withdrawn. The judgment of the District Court, 630 F. Supp. 206, is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer