Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

91-1121 (1992)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Number: 91-1121 Visitors: 6
Filed: Feb. 25, 1992
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 957 F.2d 796 William Carroll RUSSELL, Jr., an individual, doing business as Weekly Register-Call, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kay TURNBAUGH and Ruth Ann Andere, individuals; KLT Communications, Inc., a Colorado corporation, also known as KLT Communications, Inc., Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-1121. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. Feb. 25, 1992. (D.C. No. 90-F-272) (D. Colorado), Sherman G. Finesilver-J. Before SEYMOUR, MOORE and BALDOCK, Circuit Judges. ORDER PER CURIAM. 1 Pursuant to
More

957 F.2d 796

William Carroll RUSSELL, Jr., an individual, doing business
as Weekly Register-Call, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Kay TURNBAUGH and Ruth Ann Andere, individuals; KLT
Communications, Inc., a Colorado corporation, also
known as KLT Communications, Inc.,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 91-1121.

United States Court of Appeals,
Tenth Circuit.

Feb. 25, 1992.

(D.C. No. 90-F-272) (D. Colorado), Sherman G. Finesilver--J.

Before SEYMOUR, MOORE and BALDOCK, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

1

Pursuant to Rule 42(b), Fed.R.App.P., and the stipulation submitted by the parties, this appeal is dismissed as moot. The case is remanded to the district court with instructions to vacate its judgment and dismiss the complaint. United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U.S. 36, 39-40 (1950); Beattie v. United States, 949 F.2d 1092, 1095 (10th Cir.1991); Tosco Corp. v. Hodel, 826 F.2d 948 (10th Cir.1987).

2

Each party shall bear its own costs and the mandate shall issue forthwith.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer