Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Liberty Mortgage Company v. Robin Dale Frey, Ann Spears, Trustee, Trustee, 92-6167 (1992)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Number: 92-6167 Visitors: 20
Filed: Dec. 18, 1992
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 982 F.2d 529 NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order. LIBERTY MORTGAGE COMPANY, Appellant, v. Robin Dale FREY, Appellee. Ann SPEARS, Tr
More

982 F.2d 529

NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order.

LIBERTY MORTGAGE COMPANY, Appellant,
v.
Robin Dale FREY, Appellee.
Ann SPEARS, Trustee, Trustee.

No. 92-6167.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

Dec. 18, 1992.

Before JOHN P. MOORE, TACHA and BRORBY, Circuit Judges.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

JOHN P. MOORE, Circuit Judge.

1

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.9. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

2

This bankruptcy appeal presents the identical issue already decided in Eastland Mortgage Co. v. Hart, 923 F.2d 1410 (10th Cir.1991). We adhere to that decision and AFFIRM.

*

This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall not be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit, except for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. 10th Cir.R. 36.3

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer