Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

John Edward Maberry v. Earl D. Jones, District Court Judge, Johnson County, Kansas, 92-3452 (1993)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Number: 92-3452 Visitors: 45
Filed: Apr. 22, 1993
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 992 F.2d 1223 NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order. John Edward MABERRY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Earl D. JONES, District Court Judge
More

992 F.2d 1223

NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order.

John Edward MABERRY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Earl D. JONES, District Court Judge, Johnson County, Kansas,
Defendant-Appellee.

No. 92-3452.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

April 22, 1993.

Before McKAY, Chief Judge, and SETH and BARRETT, Circuit Judges.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

McKAY, Chief Judge.

1

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

2

This matter is before the court on appellant's motion for leave to proceed on appeal without prepayment of costs or fees court. The court grants this motion.

3

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons given by the trial court.

*

This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall not be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit, except for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. 10th Cir.R. 36.3

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer