Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

93-3015 (1993)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Number: 93-3015 Visitors: 14
Filed: Oct. 05, 1993
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 7 F.3d 1044 NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order. George F. FULLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CONTINENTAL PLASTIC COMPANY; Ann Bennett
More

7 F.3d 1044

NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order.

George F. FULLER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CONTINENTAL PLASTIC COMPANY; Ann Bennett, Human Resources
Supervisor at Continental Plastic Company; Local 233 GMP
Union; and Dale Jeter, Representative of GMP Union Local
233, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 93-3015.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

Oct. 5, 1993.

Before LOGAN, MOORE, and BRORBY, Circuit Judges.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT1

1

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

2

AFFIRMED for the reasons stated by the district court in its order of December 30, 1992.

1

This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall not be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit, except for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. 10th Cir.R. 36.3

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer