Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Carl R. Kennedy, 19-3183 (1994)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Number: 19-3183 Visitors: 26
Filed: Aug. 05, 1994
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 34 F.3d 1077 NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carl R. KENNEDY, Defendant-Appel
More

34 F.3d 1077

NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Carl R. KENNEDY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 93-6312.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

Aug. 5, 1994.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT1

Before SEYMOUR, Chief Judge, MOORE and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

1

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

2

This is an appeal from the district court's denial of release pending sentencing. After considering defendant's expedited motion for release pending sentencing, we remanded to the district court for further proceedings. The appeal was abated pending remand.

3

After the remand, the district court sentenced defendant. The sentencing mooted this appeal.

4

Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED as moot.

1

This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of the court's General Order filed November 29, 1993. 151 F.R.D. 470

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer