Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

No. 95-1343. (d.c.no. 95-Cb-669), 392 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Number: 392 Visitors: 19
Filed: Feb. 08, 1996
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 76 F.3d 392 NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order. Robert L. CARROLL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Paul WESTERKAMP, # 74065; McGovern, # 8
More

76 F.3d 392

NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order.

Robert L. CARROLL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Paul WESTERKAMP, # 74065; McGovern, # 88034; Denver Police
Department; City and County of Denver,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-1343.
(D.C.No. 95-CB-669)

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

Feb. 8, 1996.

Before PORFILIO, McKAY and KELLY, Circuit Judges.

1

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

2

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

3

After a careful review of the briefs and record in this case, we AFFIRM for the reasons given by the district court. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

*

This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer