Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Carroll v. Westerkamp, 95-1343 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Number: 95-1343 Visitors: 6
Filed: Feb. 08, 1996
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Filed 2/8/96 TENTH CIRCUIT ROBERT L. CARROLL, Plaintiff - Appellant, No. 95-1343 v. (D.C. No. 95-CB-669) PAUL WESTERKAMP, #74065; (District of Colorado) MCGOVERN, #88034; DENVER POLICE DEPARTMENT; CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, Defendants - Appellees. ORDER AND JUDGMENT* Before PORFILIO, McKAY and KELLY, Circuit Judges. After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination
More
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Filed 2/8/96 TENTH CIRCUIT ROBERT L. CARROLL, Plaintiff - Appellant, No. 95-1343 v. (D.C. No. 95-CB-669) PAUL WESTERKAMP, #74065; (District of Colorado) MCGOVERN, #88034; DENVER POLICE DEPARTMENT; CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, Defendants - Appellees. ORDER AND JUDGMENT* Before PORFILIO, McKAY and KELLY, Circuit Judges. After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. * This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. After a careful review of the briefs and record in this case, we AFFIRM for the reasons given by the district court. The mandate shall issue forthwith. Entered for the Court Monroe G. McKay Circuit Judge 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer