Filed: Feb. 11, 1997
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 105 F.3d 1336 97 CJ C.A.R. 243 Lavern BERRYHILL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Edward EVANS, Respondent-Appellee. No. 96-6264. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. Feb. 11, 1997. Before SEYMOUR, Chief Judge; PORFILIO, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. JOHN C. PORFILIO, Circuit Judge. 1 Appellant has failed to demonstrate the denial of a constitutional right by showing the issues raised in his appeal are debatable among jurists; that a court could resolve the issues differently; or that the questi
Summary: 105 F.3d 1336 97 CJ C.A.R. 243 Lavern BERRYHILL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Edward EVANS, Respondent-Appellee. No. 96-6264. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. Feb. 11, 1997. Before SEYMOUR, Chief Judge; PORFILIO, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. JOHN C. PORFILIO, Circuit Judge. 1 Appellant has failed to demonstrate the denial of a constitutional right by showing the issues raised in his appeal are debatable among jurists; that a court could resolve the issues differently; or that the questio..
More
105 F.3d 1336
97 CJ C.A.R. 243
Lavern BERRYHILL, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Edward EVANS, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 96-6264.
United States Court of Appeals,
Tenth Circuit.
Feb. 11, 1997.
Before SEYMOUR, Chief Judge; PORFILIO, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.
JOHN C. PORFILIO, Circuit Judge.
1
Appellant has failed to demonstrate the denial of a constitutional right by showing the issues raised in his appeal are debatable among jurists; that a court could resolve the issues differently; or that the questions deserve further proceedings. Essentially for the reasons stated in the recommendation of the magistrate judge contained in the record, the certificate of appealability is DENIED, and the appeal is DISMISSED. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Lennox v. Evans, 87 F.3d 431 (10th Cir.1996).
