Filed: Dec. 22, 1997
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 22 1997 TENTH CIRCUIT PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, No. 97-2154 v. (D.C. No. CV-96-519 JP/JHG) THOMAS TURNER, (D. New Mex.) Defendant - Appellant. ORDER AND JUDGMENT* Before ANDERSON, McKAY, and LUCERO, Circuit Judges. After examining Appellant’s brief and the appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the det
Summary: F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 22 1997 TENTH CIRCUIT PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, No. 97-2154 v. (D.C. No. CV-96-519 JP/JHG) THOMAS TURNER, (D. New Mex.) Defendant - Appellant. ORDER AND JUDGMENT* Before ANDERSON, McKAY, and LUCERO, Circuit Judges. After examining Appellant’s brief and the appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the dete..
More
F I L E D
United States Court of Appeals
Tenth Circuit
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
DEC 22 1997
TENTH CIRCUIT
PATRICK FISHER
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee, No. 97-2154
v. (D.C. No. CV-96-519 JP/JHG)
THOMAS TURNER, (D. New Mex.)
Defendant - Appellant.
ORDER AND JUDGMENT*
Before ANDERSON, McKAY, and LUCERO, Circuit Judges.
After examining Appellant’s brief and the appellate record, this panel has
determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination
of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore
ordered submitted without oral argument.
Appellant claims that his conviction was fundamentally defective because he was
allowed to plead guilty to conduct that was not a crime, in violation of his right to due
process. Mr. Turner appeals the district court’s denial of his Motion to Vacate, Set Aside,
*
This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of
law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the
citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under
the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.
or Correct Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, and the district court’s dismissal of his
action.
We grant Appellant’s motion for leave to proceed without prepayment of costs or
fees, and we grant Appellant a certificate of appealability. We affirm the judgment for the
reasons given in the magistrate judge’s Proposed Findings and Recommended
Disposition, as adopted and supplemented by the district court in its Order filed April 1,
1997.
AFFIRMED.
Entered for the Court
Monroe G. McKay
Circuit Judge
2