Filed: May 11, 2001
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 11 2001 FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT PATRICK FISHER Clerk AMERICAN CITIZEN CHILDREN ##1-1,375, all minors, by and through their next best friend SANDRA RODRIGUES, Plaintiffs-Appellants, and BELEN VERDUZCO, No. 00-4128 (D.C. No. 99-CV-41-K) Plaintiff, (D. Utah) v. JOHN ASHCROFT, United States Attorney General; * COLIN L. POWELL, Secretary of State; ** KEVIN D. ROONEY, Acting Commissioner of INS; *** GEORGE W. BUSH,
Summary: F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 11 2001 FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT PATRICK FISHER Clerk AMERICAN CITIZEN CHILDREN ##1-1,375, all minors, by and through their next best friend SANDRA RODRIGUES, Plaintiffs-Appellants, and BELEN VERDUZCO, No. 00-4128 (D.C. No. 99-CV-41-K) Plaintiff, (D. Utah) v. JOHN ASHCROFT, United States Attorney General; * COLIN L. POWELL, Secretary of State; ** KEVIN D. ROONEY, Acting Commissioner of INS; *** GEORGE W. BUSH, ..
More
F I L E D
United States Court of Appeals
Tenth Circuit
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
MAY 11 2001
FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT
PATRICK FISHER
Clerk
AMERICAN CITIZEN CHILDREN
##1-1,375, all minors, by and
through their next best friend
SANDRA RODRIGUES,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
and
BELEN VERDUZCO, No. 00-4128
(D.C. No. 99-CV-41-K)
Plaintiff, (D. Utah)
v.
JOHN ASHCROFT, United States
Attorney General; * COLIN L.
POWELL, Secretary of State; **
KEVIN D. ROONEY, Acting
Commissioner of INS; *** GEORGE
W. BUSH, President of the
United States, ****
Defendants-Appellees.
*
Pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 43(c)(2), John Ashcroft is substituted for Janet
Reno, United States Attorney General, as an appellee in this action.
**
Pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 43(c)(2), Colin L. Powell is substituted for
Madeline Albright, Secretary of State, as an appellee in this action.
***
On March 26, 2001, Kevin D. Rooney became the Acting Commissioner
of INS. Pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 43(c)(2), Mr. Rooney is substituted for
Doris Meissner as an appellee in this action.
****
Pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 43(c)(2), George W. Bush is substituted for
William J. Clinton, President of the United States, as an appellee in this action.
ORDER AND JUDGMENT *****
Before SEYMOUR , BRORBY , and BRISCOE , Circuit Judges.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined
unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination
of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is
therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Appellants are 1,375 minor United States citizen children whose parents are
undocumented aliens residing illegally in the United States. Sandra Rodrigues,
a resident alien, brought this action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named
Agents of the Fed. Bureau of Narcotics ,
403 U.S. 388 (1971), on their behalf
claiming that defendants’ enforcement of the immigration laws against the
children’s parents has violated or will violate the children’s rights under the
Fourth, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendments. The district court dismissed the
second amended complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be
granted and denied leave to amend. The district court also denied appellants’
*****
This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the
doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court
generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order
and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.
-2-
motion to alter or amend the judgment. They appeal. We have jurisdiction under
28 U.S.C. § 1291.
We review de novo the district court’s dismissal of the complaint. Gohier
v. Enright ,
186 F.3d 1216, 1218 (10th Cir. 1999). We find no error. The law is
clear that “the incidental impact visited upon the children of deportable, illegal
aliens does not raise constitutional problems.” Delgado v. INS ,
637 F.2d 762,
764 (10th Cir. 1980). The district court correctly relied on Delgado in
dismissing appellants’ case for failure to state a claim. We therefore affirm
for substantially the same reasons as those set out in the district court’s order
filed on April 12, 2000.
AFFIRMED.
Entered for the Court
Mary Beck Briscoe
Circuit Judge
-3-