Filed: Nov. 29, 2001
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 29 2001 FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT PATRICK FISHER Clerk GEORGE MURPHY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. No. 01-4072 (D.C. No. 00-CV-177-K) D.V. DEVENISH; COLBY RUSSELL; (D. Utah) CASEY NELSON, also known as Casey; PRECISION TOWING; S. MARTIN, Defendants-Appellees. ORDER AND JUDGMENT * Before KELLY , BALDOCK , and LUCERO , Circuit Judges. After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimous
Summary: F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 29 2001 FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT PATRICK FISHER Clerk GEORGE MURPHY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. No. 01-4072 (D.C. No. 00-CV-177-K) D.V. DEVENISH; COLBY RUSSELL; (D. Utah) CASEY NELSON, also known as Casey; PRECISION TOWING; S. MARTIN, Defendants-Appellees. ORDER AND JUDGMENT * Before KELLY , BALDOCK , and LUCERO , Circuit Judges. After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimousl..
More
F I L E D
United States Court of Appeals
Tenth Circuit
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
NOV 29 2001
FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT
PATRICK FISHER
Clerk
GEORGE MURPHY,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v. No. 01-4072
(D.C. No. 00-CV-177-K)
D.V. DEVENISH; COLBY RUSSELL; (D. Utah)
CASEY NELSON, also known as
Casey; PRECISION TOWING;
S. MARTIN,
Defendants-Appellees.
ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
Before KELLY , BALDOCK , and LUCERO , Circuit Judges.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined
unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of
this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is
therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
*
This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the
doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court
generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order
and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.
Plaintiff George Murphy filed a civil rights suit under 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
protesting the seizure and impoundment of his vehicle. The district court ruled
that the state defendants enjoyed qualified immunity and that the remaining
defendants did not act under color of state law. Murphy appeals. The parties are
familiar with the facts, so we need not repeat them here. We affirm the judgment
of the district court for substantially the reasons stated by the court in its order
dated March 21, 2001.
The judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Utah is
AFFIRMED.
Entered for the Court
Bobby R. Baldock
Circuit Judge
-2-