Filed: Jul. 01, 2005
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS July 1, 2005 FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT PATRICK FISHER Clerk KENNETH E. TURRENTINE, Petitioner - Appellant, v. No. 05-5106 MIKE MULLIN, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary, Respondent - Appellee. ORDER AND JUDGMENT * Before LUCERO, McCONNELL, and TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judges. Petitioner, Kenneth Eugene Turrentine, filed an appeal in this matter on July 1, 2005. He appeals two orders entered by the district court on Jun
Summary: F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS July 1, 2005 FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT PATRICK FISHER Clerk KENNETH E. TURRENTINE, Petitioner - Appellant, v. No. 05-5106 MIKE MULLIN, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary, Respondent - Appellee. ORDER AND JUDGMENT * Before LUCERO, McCONNELL, and TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judges. Petitioner, Kenneth Eugene Turrentine, filed an appeal in this matter on July 1, 2005. He appeals two orders entered by the district court on June..
More
F I L E D
United States Court of Appeals
Tenth Circuit
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
July 1, 2005
FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT
PATRICK FISHER
Clerk
KENNETH E. TURRENTINE,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
No. 05-5106
MIKE MULLIN, Warden, Oklahoma
State Penitentiary,
Respondent - Appellee.
ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
Before LUCERO, McCONNELL, and TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judges.
Petitioner, Kenneth Eugene Turrentine, filed an appeal in this matter on
July 1, 2005. He appeals two orders entered by the district court on June 21,
2005. The district court’s first order denied Turrentine’s request for the
appointment of counsel pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 848(q). The second order granted
*
This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the
doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court
generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an
order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th
Cir. R. 36.3.
the withdrawal of Turrentine’s counsel of record, Stephen Gruebel. Taking
jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 1331, we order as follows.
We reverse the court’s order denying the appointment of counsel, and direct
the district court to obtain replacement counsel for Mr. Turrentine as soon as
practicable.
We affirm the district court’s order granting Mr. Gruebel’s motion to
withdraw as counsel. 1
Entered for the Court
Per Curiam
1
On June 28, 2005, this court issued an order denying the motion to
withdraw of Mr. Turrentine’s counsel, Mr. Gruebel. At the time we issued
this order, the panel was unaware of the district court’s June 21, 2005 order
allowing the withdrawal of Mr. Gruebel on the grounds of conflict of
interests. Given the conflict between our June 28 order and the district
court’s June 21 order, this panel sua sponte withdraws its order denying
withdrawal. We hereby grant Mr. Gruebel’s request to withdraw as
appellate counsel.
-2-