Filed: Jun. 15, 2006
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES CO URT O F APPEALS June 15, 2006 FO R TH E TENTH CIRCUIT Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court TON Y D . M CK NIGH T, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. No. 05-5082 (D.C. No. 00-CV-619-SA J) JO A NN E B. BA RN HA RT, (N.D. Okla.) Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant-Appellee. OR D ER AND JUDGM ENT * Before L UC ER O, EBEL, and M U RPH Y, Circuit Judges. Tony D. M cKnight appeals the district court’s denial of an award
Summary: F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES CO URT O F APPEALS June 15, 2006 FO R TH E TENTH CIRCUIT Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court TON Y D . M CK NIGH T, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. No. 05-5082 (D.C. No. 00-CV-619-SA J) JO A NN E B. BA RN HA RT, (N.D. Okla.) Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant-Appellee. OR D ER AND JUDGM ENT * Before L UC ER O, EBEL, and M U RPH Y, Circuit Judges. Tony D. M cKnight appeals the district court’s denial of an award o..
More
F I L E D
United States Court of Appeals
Tenth Circuit
UNITED STATES CO URT O F APPEALS
June 15, 2006
FO R TH E TENTH CIRCUIT Elisabeth A. Shumaker
Clerk of Court
TON Y D . M CK NIGH T,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v. No. 05-5082
(D.C. No. 00-CV-619-SA J)
JO A NN E B. BA RN HA RT, (N.D. Okla.)
Commissioner of Social Security
Administration,
Defendant-Appellee.
OR D ER AND JUDGM ENT *
Before L UC ER O, EBEL, and M U RPH Y, Circuit Judges.
Tony D. M cKnight appeals the district court’s denial of an award of
attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1). In M cGraw v. Barnhart, __ F.3d __,
No. 05-5079 (10th Cir. June 13, 2006), this court held that § 406(b)(1) allows an
award of fees when the district court has remanded a Title II Social Security case
*
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined
unanimously to grant the parties’ request for a decision on the briefs without oral
argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(f); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore
ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment is not binding
precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and
collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and
judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and
conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.
for further proceedings. Thus, the judgment of the district court is REVERSED
and REM ANDED for further proceedings in light of M cGraw. Appellant’s
motion to file an addendum of recent citations is GRANTED and the Clerk is
directed to accept the addendum for filing as of the date of original receipt.
Entered for the Court
David M . Ebel
Circuit Judge
-2-