Filed: Mar. 25, 2009
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit March 25, 2009 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court TENTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 08-1255 (D.C. No. 96-CR-00444-EWN-1) ARNIE PORTER, (D. Colo.) Defendant-Appellant. ORDER AND JUDGMENT * Before KELLY, McKAY, and HARTZ, Circuit Judges. The defendant filed a motion in the district court seeking a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), which retroactively reduced cer
Summary: FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit March 25, 2009 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court TENTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 08-1255 (D.C. No. 96-CR-00444-EWN-1) ARNIE PORTER, (D. Colo.) Defendant-Appellant. ORDER AND JUDGMENT * Before KELLY, McKAY, and HARTZ, Circuit Judges. The defendant filed a motion in the district court seeking a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), which retroactively reduced cert..
More
FILED
United States Court of Appeals
Tenth Circuit
March 25, 2009
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
Elisabeth A. Shumaker
Clerk of Court
TENTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v. No. 08-1255
(D.C. No. 96-CR-00444-EWN-1)
ARNIE PORTER, (D. Colo.)
Defendant-Appellant.
ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
Before KELLY, McKAY, and HARTZ, Circuit Judges.
The defendant filed a motion in the district court seeking a sentence
reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), which retroactively reduced certain
prior final sentences for crack cocaine convictions. He asked the trial court to
reduce his prior final sentence below the amended Guideline range. The court
reduced Defendant’s sentence to the bottom of the amended range but refused to
*
This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the
doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited,
however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th
Cir. R. 32.1.
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this panel has
determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the
determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Therefore, this case
is ordered submitted without oral argument.
consider the additional reduction, indicating it lacked authority to do so.
Defendant appeals that decision.
In the interim, this court decided United States v. Rhodes,
549 F.3d 833
(10th Cir. 2008), which forecloses Defendant’s argument.
AFFIRMED.
Entered for the Court
Monroe G. McKay
Circuit Judge
-2-