Filed: Oct. 29, 2010
Latest Update: Oct. 29, 2010
Summary: OPINION ON REMAND FROM THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT TACHA, Circuit Judge. On remand from the United States Supreme Court's opinion in Teamsters Local Union Number 523 v. N.L.R.B., ___ U.S. ___, 131 S.Ct. 109, ___ L.Ed.2d ___, 2010 WL 1990005 (2010), we hold that the two-member NLRB group that issued the order in this case lacked statutory authority to act. New Process Steel, L.P. v. N.L.R.B., ___ U.S. ___, 130 S.Ct. 2635 , 2640, 177 L.Ed.2d 162 (2010). Therefore, we VACATE the Board's
Summary: OPINION ON REMAND FROM THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT TACHA, Circuit Judge. On remand from the United States Supreme Court's opinion in Teamsters Local Union Number 523 v. N.L.R.B., ___ U.S. ___, 131 S.Ct. 109, ___ L.Ed.2d ___, 2010 WL 1990005 (2010), we hold that the two-member NLRB group that issued the order in this case lacked statutory authority to act. New Process Steel, L.P. v. N.L.R.B., ___ U.S. ___, 130 S.Ct. 2635 , 2640, 177 L.Ed.2d 162 (2010). Therefore, we VACATE the Board's o..
More
OPINION ON REMAND FROM THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT
TACHA, Circuit Judge.
On remand from the United States Supreme Court's opinion in Teamsters Local Union Number 523 v. N.L.R.B., ___ U.S. ___, 131 S.Ct. 109, ___ L.Ed.2d ___, 2010 WL 1990005 (2010), we hold that the two-member NLRB group that issued the order in this case lacked statutory authority to act. New Process Steel, L.P. v. N.L.R.B., ___ U.S. ___, 130 S.Ct. 2635, 2640, 177 L.Ed.2d 162 (2010). Therefore, we VACATE the Board's order and REMAND to the Board for further proceedings. We GRANT Respondent/Cross-Petitioner's motion for remand.
