Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Steele v. Ashanti, 16-1091 (2016)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Number: 16-1091 Visitors: 5
Filed: Jun. 22, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: FILED United States Court of Appeals UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Tenth Circuit TENTH CIRCUIT June 22, 2016 Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court DELBERT C. STEELE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. No. 16-1091 (D.C. No. 1:15-CV-02690-LTB) ANGLO GOLD ASHANTI/ (D. Colo.) CRIPPLE CREEK & VICTOR GOLD MINE, Defendant-Appellee. ORDER AND JUDGMENT * Before LUCERO, MATHESON, and BACHARACH, Circuit Judges. The district court dismissed the action without prejudice based on a lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. M
More
FILED United States Court of Appeals UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Tenth Circuit TENTH CIRCUIT June 22, 2016 Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court DELBERT C. STEELE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. No. 16-1091 (D.C. No. 1:15-CV-02690-LTB) ANGLO GOLD ASHANTI/ (D. Colo.) CRIPPLE CREEK & VICTOR GOLD MINE, Defendant-Appellee. ORDER AND JUDGMENT * Before LUCERO, MATHESON, and BACHARACH, Circuit Judges. The district court dismissed the action without prejudice based on a lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Mr. Steele agrees with the district court’s ruling. Thus, we dismiss the appeal and grant Mr. Steele’s * We do not believe oral argument would be helpful. As a result, we are deciding the appeal based on the briefs. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). This order and judgment does not constitute binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. But the order and judgment may be cited for its persuasive value under Fed. R. App. P. 32.1(a) and 10th Cir. R. 32.1(A). application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Entered for the Court Robert E. Bacharach Circuit Judge 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer