Filed: Mar. 27, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: FILED United States Court of Appeals UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Tenth Circuit FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT March 27, 2017 _ Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. No. 15-1459 (D.C. Nos. 1:15-CV-02489-REB and SHAWN LA VELLE ROLLINS, 1:06-CR-00240-REB-1) (D. Colo.) Defendant - Appellant. - THE FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER FOR THE DISTRICTS OF COLORADO AND WYOMING, Amicus Curiae. _ ORDER AND JUDGMENT _ Before BRISCOE, McKAY, and McHUGH, Circuit Judges. _ Th
Summary: FILED United States Court of Appeals UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Tenth Circuit FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT March 27, 2017 _ Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. No. 15-1459 (D.C. Nos. 1:15-CV-02489-REB and SHAWN LA VELLE ROLLINS, 1:06-CR-00240-REB-1) (D. Colo.) Defendant - Appellant. - THE FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER FOR THE DISTRICTS OF COLORADO AND WYOMING, Amicus Curiae. _ ORDER AND JUDGMENT _ Before BRISCOE, McKAY, and McHUGH, Circuit Judges. _ Thi..
More
FILED
United States Court of Appeals
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Tenth Circuit
FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT March 27, 2017
_________________________________
Elisabeth A. Shumaker
Clerk of Court
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v. No. 15-1459
(D.C. Nos. 1:15-CV-02489-REB and
SHAWN LA VELLE ROLLINS, 1:06-CR-00240-REB-1)
(D. Colo.)
Defendant - Appellant.
--------------------------------------
THE FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER
FOR THE DISTRICTS OF COLORADO
AND WYOMING,
Amicus Curiae.
_________________________________
ORDER AND JUDGMENT
_________________________________
Before BRISCOE, McKAY, and McHUGH, Circuit Judges.
_________________________________
This matter comes on for consideration of the government’s Unopposed Motion
for Summary Affirmance, in which the government moves for summary affirmance of the
district court’s sentencing determination in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in
Beckles v. United States, ___ S. Ct. ___,
2017 WL 855781 (March 6, 2017). Defendant
Shawn La Velle Rollins does not oppose the motion.
This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of
law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its
persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.
Upon consideration thereof, the motion is granted. The judgment of the district
court is affirmed.
The mandate shall issue forthwith.
Entered for the Court
Per Curiam
2