Filed: Mar. 09, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: FILED United States Court of Appeals UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Tenth Circuit FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT March 9, 2017 _ Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. No. 16-1430 (D.C. Nos. 1:16-CV-01431-LTB and 1:07- WILLIAM LYNN YOUNG, CR-00321-LTB-1) (D. Colo.) Defendant - Appellant. _ ORDER AND JUDGMENT _ Before MATHESON, BACHARACH, and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges. _ This matter is before us on Appellee’s Unopposed Motion for Summary Affirmance. The Uni
Summary: FILED United States Court of Appeals UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Tenth Circuit FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT March 9, 2017 _ Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. No. 16-1430 (D.C. Nos. 1:16-CV-01431-LTB and 1:07- WILLIAM LYNN YOUNG, CR-00321-LTB-1) (D. Colo.) Defendant - Appellant. _ ORDER AND JUDGMENT _ Before MATHESON, BACHARACH, and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges. _ This matter is before us on Appellee’s Unopposed Motion for Summary Affirmance. The Unit..
More
FILED
United States Court of Appeals
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Tenth Circuit
FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT March 9, 2017
_________________________________
Elisabeth A. Shumaker
Clerk of Court
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v. No. 16-1430
(D.C. Nos. 1:16-CV-01431-LTB and 1:07-
WILLIAM LYNN YOUNG, CR-00321-LTB-1)
(D. Colo.)
Defendant - Appellant.
_________________________________
ORDER AND JUDGMENT
_________________________________
Before MATHESON, BACHARACH, and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges.
_________________________________
This matter is before us on Appellee’s Unopposed Motion for Summary
Affirmance. The United States moves for summary affirmance of the district court’s
judgment in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Beckles v. United States, __S. Ct.__,
2017 WL 855781 (Mar. 6, 2017). Appellant William Lynn Young does not oppose the
motion.
Upon consideration, the motion is granted. The judgment of the district court is
affirmed.
This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of
law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its
persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.
The mandate shall issue forthwith.
Entered for the Court
Per Curiam
2