Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Means-Goodman, 18-8037 (2019)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Number: 18-8037 Visitors: 22
Filed: May 16, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: FILED United States Court of Appeals UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Tenth Circuit FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT May 16, 2019 _ Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. No. 18-8037 (D.C. No. 2:17-CR-00211-NDF-1) CAMERON MEANS-GOODMAN, (D. Wyo.) Defendant - Appellant. _ ORDER AND JUDGMENT* _ Before MATHESON, BACHARACH, and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges. _ This matter is before the court on the appellant’s Motion to Dismiss Appeal as Moot (the “Motion”). For the re
More
FILED United States Court of Appeals UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Tenth Circuit FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT May 16, 2019 _________________________________ Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. No. 18-8037 (D.C. No. 2:17-CR-00211-NDF-1) CAMERON MEANS-GOODMAN, (D. Wyo.) Defendant - Appellant. _________________________________ ORDER AND JUDGMENT* _________________________________ Before MATHESON, BACHARACH, and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges. _________________________________ This matter is before the court on the appellant’s Motion to Dismiss Appeal as Moot (the “Motion”). For the reasons stated in the Motion, the Motion is granted. This appeal is dismissed as moot. The clerk is directed to issue the mandate forthwith. Entered for the Court ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk by: Lara Smith Counsel to the Clerk * After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer