Filed: Sep. 17, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: FILED United States Court of Appeals UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Tenth Circuit FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT September 17, 2019 _ Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. No. 19-1159 (D.C. No. 1:18-CR-00134-RM-1) ASIEL RODRIGUEZ, (D. Colo.) Defendant - Appellant. _ ORDER AND JUDGMENT * _ Before TYMKOVICH, Chief Judge, LUCERO and HARTZ, Circuit Judges. _ Asiel Rodriguez pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to possess counterfeit access devices. The d
Summary: FILED United States Court of Appeals UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Tenth Circuit FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT September 17, 2019 _ Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. No. 19-1159 (D.C. No. 1:18-CR-00134-RM-1) ASIEL RODRIGUEZ, (D. Colo.) Defendant - Appellant. _ ORDER AND JUDGMENT * _ Before TYMKOVICH, Chief Judge, LUCERO and HARTZ, Circuit Judges. _ Asiel Rodriguez pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to possess counterfeit access devices. The di..
More
FILED
United States Court of Appeals
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Tenth Circuit
FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT September 17, 2019
_________________________________
Elisabeth A. Shumaker
Clerk of Court
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v. No. 19-1159
(D.C. No. 1:18-CR-00134-RM-1)
ASIEL RODRIGUEZ, (D. Colo.)
Defendant - Appellant.
_________________________________
ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
_________________________________
Before TYMKOVICH, Chief Judge, LUCERO and HARTZ, Circuit Judges.
_________________________________
Asiel Rodriguez pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to possess
counterfeit access devices. The district court sentenced him to 48 months in prison.
Although Mr. Rodriguez’s plea agreement included a waiver of his right to appeal, he
filed this appeal. The government has moved to enforce the appeal waiver under
United States v. Hahn,
359 F.3d 1315 (10th Cir. 2004) (en banc) (per curiam).
Mr. Rodriguez, through his counsel, concedes that the appeal waiver bars the appeal
and no exception set forth in Hahn applies. Based on this concession and our
*
This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines
of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for
its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.
independent review of the record, we grant the government’s motion and dismiss the
appeal.
Entered for the Court
Per Curiam
2