Filed: Oct. 18, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: FILED United States Court of Appeals UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Tenth Circuit FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT October 18, 2019 _ Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. No. 19-1239 (D.C. No. 1:18-CR-00570-PAB-1) JAMES EARLEY, (D. Colo.) Defendant - Appellant. _ ORDER AND JUDGMENT * _ Before TYMKOVICH, Chief Judge, HOLMES and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges. _ James Earley pleaded guilty to one count of concealment of an event affecting entitlement to social sec
Summary: FILED United States Court of Appeals UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Tenth Circuit FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT October 18, 2019 _ Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. No. 19-1239 (D.C. No. 1:18-CR-00570-PAB-1) JAMES EARLEY, (D. Colo.) Defendant - Appellant. _ ORDER AND JUDGMENT * _ Before TYMKOVICH, Chief Judge, HOLMES and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges. _ James Earley pleaded guilty to one count of concealment of an event affecting entitlement to social secu..
More
FILED
United States Court of Appeals
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Tenth Circuit
FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT October 18, 2019
_________________________________
Elisabeth A. Shumaker
Clerk of Court
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v. No. 19-1239
(D.C. No. 1:18-CR-00570-PAB-1)
JAMES EARLEY, (D. Colo.)
Defendant - Appellant.
_________________________________
ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
_________________________________
Before TYMKOVICH, Chief Judge, HOLMES and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges.
_________________________________
James Earley pleaded guilty to one count of concealment of an event affecting
entitlement to social security benefits. The district court sentenced him to three
years’ probation. Although Mr. Earley’s plea agreement included a waiver of his
right to appeal, he filed this appeal. The government has moved to enforce the
appeal waiver under United States v. Hahn,
359 F.3d 1315 (10th Cir. 2004) (en banc)
(per curiam). Through his counsel, Mr. Earley concedes that the appeal waiver bars
this appeal and no exception set forth in Hahn applies. Based on this concession and
*
This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines
of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for
its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.
our independent review of the record, we grant the government’s motion and dismiss
the appeal.
Entered for the Court
Per Curiam
2