Filed: Apr. 02, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit TENTH CIRCUIT April 2, 2019 Elisabeth A. Shumaker GLEN FOLSOM, Clerk of Court Petitioner - Appellant, v. No. 19-6001 (D.C. No. 5:18-CV-00905-G) OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF (W.D. Okla.) CORRECTIONS and FNU FALLEN, Respondents - Appellees. ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY Before BACHARACH, McKAY, and O’BRIEN, Circuit Judges. Glen Folsom wants to appeal from the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition. He
Summary: FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit TENTH CIRCUIT April 2, 2019 Elisabeth A. Shumaker GLEN FOLSOM, Clerk of Court Petitioner - Appellant, v. No. 19-6001 (D.C. No. 5:18-CV-00905-G) OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF (W.D. Okla.) CORRECTIONS and FNU FALLEN, Respondents - Appellees. ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY Before BACHARACH, McKAY, and O’BRIEN, Circuit Judges. Glen Folsom wants to appeal from the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition. He i..
More
FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS United States Court of Appeals
Tenth Circuit
TENTH CIRCUIT
April 2, 2019
Elisabeth A. Shumaker
GLEN FOLSOM, Clerk of Court
Petitioner - Appellant,
v. No. 19-6001
(D.C. No. 5:18-CV-00905-G)
OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF (W.D. Okla.)
CORRECTIONS and FNU FALLEN,
Respondents - Appellees.
ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY
Before BACHARACH, McKAY, and O’BRIEN, Circuit Judges.
Glen Folsom wants to appeal from the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas
petition. He is well familiar with the historical and procedural facts; we will not repeat
them. He is also well familiar with the clear and cogent recommendation of the
magistrate judge, who appropriately summarized his petition as follows: “[O]ver the
course of three and a half pages, Petitioner complains (almost incoherently) about prison
conditions, medical care, legal property, disciplinary convictions in general, criminal
convictions, and past federal and state civil cases.” (R. at 49.) His litigation tactics did not
change either in pleas to the district judge or his papers here. He makes no reasonable
effort to demonstrate how error may have been committed in the district court. His
cavalier approach entitles him to no more than a summary order from this Court.
Because no jurist of reason could reasonably debate the correctness of the result
reached by the district court, we DENY Folsom’s request for a COA and DISMISS this
matter. His request to proceed on appeal without prepayment of fees is DENIED.
Entered by the Court:
Terrence L. O’Brien
United States Circuit Judge
-2-