Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Rodgers v. Commissioner, SSA, 21-7000 (2021)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Number: 21-7000 Visitors: 20
Filed: May 25, 2021
Latest Update: May 26, 2021
                                                                                  FILED
                                                                      United States Court of Appeals
                      UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                          Tenth Circuit

                              FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT                           May 25, 2021
                          _________________________________
                                                                         Christopher M. Wolpert
                                                                             Clerk of Court
HELEN ANNETTE RODGERS,

      Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.                                                          No. 21-7000
                                               (D.C. No. 6:18-CV-00398-RAW-KEW)
COMMISSIONER, SSA,                                          (E.D. Okla.)

      Defendant - Appellee.
                      _________________________________

                              ORDER AND JUDGMENT*
                          _________________________________

Before MATHESON, BACHARACH, and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges.
                  _________________________________

      This matter is before us on the parties’ Joint Motion for Vacatur and Remand to

the District Court. Upon careful consideration, the joint motion is GRANTED. The

district court’s judgment is VACATED, and this matter is REMANDED for further

proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s intervening decision in Carr v. Saul,

141 S. Ct. 1352
 (2021).

      The mandate shall issue forthwith.


                                            Entered for the Court


                                            Per Curiam

      *
         This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines
of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for
its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer