Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Ollice Davis, Sr. v. Thomas J. Mills, Etc., 85-5036 (1985)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 85-5036 Visitors: 10
Filed: Dec. 12, 1985
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 777 F.2d 1524 Ollice DAVIS, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Thomas J. MILLS, etc., et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 85-5036. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. Dec. 12, 1985. Holland & Smith, William M. Holland, West Palm Beach, Fla., for plaintiff-appellant. Richard L. Oftedal, Robert D. Moses, West Palm Beach, Fla., for defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Before VANCE and HATCHETT, Circuit Judges, and SWYGERT * ,
More

777 F.2d 1524

Ollice DAVIS, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Thomas J. MILLS, etc., et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 85-5036.

United States Court of Appeals,
Eleventh Circuit.

Dec. 12, 1985.

Holland & Smith, William M. Holland, West Palm Beach, Fla., for plaintiff-appellant.

Richard L. Oftedal, Robert D. Moses, West Palm Beach, Fla., for defendants-appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida.

Before VANCE and HATCHETT, Circuit Judges, and SWYGERT*, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

This is an appeal from an award of attorney's fees under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1988 to a prevailing defendant in a civil rights case. Without making specific findings, the district court granted $10,000 attorney's fees plus $564.80 in costs to the defendant school board. The plaintiff now appeals.

2

Christiansburg Garment Co. v. E.E.O.C., 434 U.S. 412, 98 S. Ct. 694, 54 L. Ed. 2d 648 (1978), provides:

3

[A] plaintiff should not be assessed his opponent's attorney's fees unless a court finds that his claim was frivolous, unreasonable, or groundless, or that the plaintiff continued to litigate after it clearly became so.

4

The trial court's failure to make the specific findings required by the Christiansburg rule for award of attorney's fees to a prevailing defendant necessitates our vacation of its award. The case will be REMANDED to the district court for further proceedings including a hearing. We express no opinion as to whether fees should or should not be awarded to this defendant.

5

VACATED and REMANDED.

*

Honorable Luther M. Swygert, U.S. Circuit Judge for the Seventh Circuit, sitting by designation

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer