Filed: Sep. 21, 1987
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 828 F.2d 13 MIDWAY MANUFACTURING CO., and Illinois Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Larry KRUCKENBERG, etc., Defendant-Appellant. No. 85-3475. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. Sept. 21, 1987. James M. Campbell, The Garland Firm, Atlanta, Ga., for defendant-appellant. Stephen J. Calvacca, Paul J. Moriarty, Asst. U.S. Attys., Orlando, Fla., for plaintiff-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida. Before GODBOLD and ANDERSON, Circu
Summary: 828 F.2d 13 MIDWAY MANUFACTURING CO., and Illinois Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Larry KRUCKENBERG, etc., Defendant-Appellant. No. 85-3475. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. Sept. 21, 1987. James M. Campbell, The Garland Firm, Atlanta, Ga., for defendant-appellant. Stephen J. Calvacca, Paul J. Moriarty, Asst. U.S. Attys., Orlando, Fla., for plaintiff-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida. Before GODBOLD and ANDERSON, Circui..
More
828 F.2d 13
MIDWAY MANUFACTURING CO., and Illinois Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Larry KRUCKENBERG, etc., Defendant-Appellant.
No. 85-3475.
United States Court of Appeals,
Eleventh Circuit.
Sept. 21, 1987.
James M. Campbell, The Garland Firm, Atlanta, Ga., for defendant-appellant.
Stephen J. Calvacca, Paul J. Moriarty, Asst. U.S. Attys., Orlando, Fla., for plaintiff-appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida.
Before GODBOLD and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges, and ATKINS, Senior District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
2
In light of the decision of the Supreme Court in Young v. United States ex rel. Vuitton, and Klayminc v. United States v. ex rel. Vuitton, --- U.S. ----, 107 S. Ct. 2124, 95 L. Ed. 2d 740 (1987), the judgment of the district court finding Kruckenberg guilty of contempt is
