Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Julio Piccinonna, 86-5335 (1988)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 86-5335 Visitors: 10
Filed: Nov. 28, 1988
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 861 F.2d 639 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Julio PICCINONNA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 86-5335. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. Nov. 28, 1988. James W. McDonald, Jr., McDonald & Erickson, P.A., Homestead, Fla., for defendant-appellant. Dexter W. Lethinen, U.S. Atty., Caroline Heck, Asst. U.S. Atty., Miami, Fla., John J. Powers, III, Dept. of Justice, Main, Appellate Section, Laura Heiser, Washington, D.C., James Griffin, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Anti Trust Div.,
More

861 F.2d 639

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Julio PICCINONNA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 86-5335.

United States Court of Appeals,
Eleventh Circuit.

Nov. 28, 1988.

James W. McDonald, Jr., McDonald & Erickson, P.A., Homestead, Fla., for defendant-appellant.

Dexter W. Lethinen, U.S. Atty., Caroline Heck, Asst. U.S. Atty., Miami, Fla., John J. Powers, III, Dept. of Justice, Main, Appellate Section, Laura Heiser, Washington, D.C., James Griffin, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Anti Trust Div., Atlanta, Ga., for plaintiff-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida; Jose A. Gonzalez, Judge.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING IN BANC

(Opinion August 23, 1988, 11th Cir., 1988, 858 F.2d 743).

Before RONEY, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, VANCE, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, CLARK, EDMONDSON and COX, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

1

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing in banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing in banc,

2

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court in banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of in banc briefs. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer