Filed: May 24, 1989
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 873 F.2d 1406 In re William D. KRAEMER, Debtor. William D. KRAEMER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Glynn H. CROOK, Cynthia M. Crook, Defendants-Appellees. No. 88-8839 Non-Argument Calendar. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. May 24, 1989. Tash J. Van Dora, Savell & Williams, S. Lester Tate, III, Atlanta, Ga., for plaintiff-appellant. William Eugene Otwell, Austell, Ga., for defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia; J. Owen Fo
Summary: 873 F.2d 1406 In re William D. KRAEMER, Debtor. William D. KRAEMER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Glynn H. CROOK, Cynthia M. Crook, Defendants-Appellees. No. 88-8839 Non-Argument Calendar. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. May 24, 1989. Tash J. Van Dora, Savell & Williams, S. Lester Tate, III, Atlanta, Ga., for plaintiff-appellant. William Eugene Otwell, Austell, Ga., for defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia; J. Owen For..
More
873 F.2d 1406
In re William D. KRAEMER, Debtor.
William D. KRAEMER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Glynn H. CROOK, Cynthia M. Crook, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 88-8839
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals,
Eleventh Circuit.
May 24, 1989.
Tash J. Van Dora, Savell & Williams, S. Lester Tate, III, Atlanta, Ga., for plaintiff-appellant.
William Eugene Otwell, Austell, Ga., for defendants-appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia; J. Owen Forrester, Judge.
Before TJOFLAT, FAY and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
1
We affirm the district court's judgment for the reasons stated in its dispositive order of October 4, 1988. See Kraemer v. Crook, 94 B.R. 207 (N.D.Ga.1988).
