Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Kevin Fox v. Allied-Signal, Inc., F/k/a Garrett Alresearch Manufacturing Co. Of California, 91-5587 (1993)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 91-5587 Visitors: 19
Filed: Nov. 17, 1993
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 7 F.3d 212 Kevin FOX, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ALLIED-SIGNAL, INC., f/k/a Garrett Alresearch Manufacturing Co. of California, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-5587. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. Nov. 17, 1993. Linda Singer Stein, J. Thompson Thornton, Thornton, David, Murray, Richard & Davis, P.A., Miami, FL, for defendant-appellant. G. William Bissett, Hardy & Bissett, P.A., Miami, FL, Donald T. Norton, co-counsel, Cohen & Cohen, Hollywood, FL, for plaintiff-appellee. Appeal from t
More

7 F.3d 212

Kevin FOX, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
ALLIED-SIGNAL, INC., f/k/a Garrett Alresearch Manufacturing
Co. of California, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 91-5587.

United States Court of Appeals,
Eleventh Circuit.

Nov. 17, 1993.

Linda Singer Stein, J. Thompson Thornton, Thornton, David, Murray, Richard & Davis, P.A., Miami, FL, for defendant-appellant.

G. William Bissett, Hardy & Bissett, P.A., Miami, FL, Donald T. Norton, co-counsel, Cohen & Cohen, Hollywood, FL, for plaintiff-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. (No. 90-1399-Civ-JWK), James W. Kehoe, Judge.

Before FAY and BIRCH, Circuit Judges, and DYER, Senior Circuit Judge.

FAY, Circuit Judge:

1

Following oral argument in this case, we certified the following question of law to the Florida Supreme Court:

2

Whether the interpretation of Fla.Stat. § 768.81(3) requires consideration by the jury of a non-party's comparative fault in order to determine a party's liability?

3

Fox v. Allied-Signal, Inc., 966 F.2d 626, 628 (11th Cir.1992). That opinion contains a summary of the facts, which need not be repeated here.

4

The Florida Supreme Court has now answered the certified question in the affirmative. Allied Signal, Inc. v. Fox, 623 So. 2d 1180, 1182 (Fla.1993). We VACATE the district court judgment in this case and REMAND for a retrial in accordance with the Florida law as announced.

5

VACATED and REMANDED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer