Filed: Apr. 17, 1998
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: PUBLISH IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 96-2794 D.C. Docket No. 94-1646-CIV-T-24C WEST AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus BAND & DESENBERG, a Florida Partnership, Defendant-Appellant, MARILYN PARKHURST, MARLENE GREEN, SHARON REILLY, SUSAN ANDERSON, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida (April 17, 1998) Before CARNES, Circuit Judge, CLARK and CAMPBELL*, Senior Circui
Summary: PUBLISH IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 96-2794 D.C. Docket No. 94-1646-CIV-T-24C WEST AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus BAND & DESENBERG, a Florida Partnership, Defendant-Appellant, MARILYN PARKHURST, MARLENE GREEN, SHARON REILLY, SUSAN ANDERSON, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida (April 17, 1998) Before CARNES, Circuit Judge, CLARK and CAMPBELL*, Senior Circuit..
More
PUBLISH
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-2794
D.C. Docket No. 94-1646-CIV-T-24C
WEST AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign
corporation,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
BAND & DESENBERG, a Florida Partnership,
Defendant-Appellant,
MARILYN PARKHURST, MARLENE GREEN, SHARON
REILLY, SUSAN ANDERSON,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Middle District of Florida
(April 17, 1998)
Before CARNES, Circuit Judge, CLARK and CAMPBELL*, Senior Circuit Judges.
CLARK, Senior Circuit Judge:
*Honorable Levin H. Campbell, Senior U.S. Circuit Judge for the First Circuit, sitting by
designation.
This is an appeal from the district court’s order granting the plaintiff’s
motion for summary judgment in an insurance declaratory judgment action. The
district court’s order, published at
925 F. Supp. 758 (M.D. Fla.1996), contains a
concise presentation of the facts and an excellent discussion of the law, but noted that
Florida law was not settled on the interpretation of an absolute pollution exclusion.
Since the district court’s opinion was issued, the Florida Supreme Court decided Deni
Associates of Florida, Inc. v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Ins. Co.,1 and ruled that two
pollution exclusion clauses nearly identical to the pollution exclusion clause in this
case presented no ambiguities.2 Based on that opinion, we hold that the pollution
exclusion clause at issue here is not ambiguous, and AFFIRM the district court’s grant
of summary judgment to the plaintiff.
1
Deni Associates of Florida, Inc. v. State Farm Fire & Cas.
Ins. Co., So.2d (1998).
2
Id. at .
2