Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Chapman v. AI Transport, 97-8838 (1999)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 97-8838 Visitors: 33
Filed: Jul. 13, 1999
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: PUBLISH IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED Nos. 97-8838, 97-9086 & 97-9269 COURT OF APPEALS U.S. _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT D.C. Docket No. 94-01666-1-CV APR 03 2000 THOMAS K. KAHN CLERK JOHN D. CHAPMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus AI TRANSPORT; AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL ADJUSTMENT COMPANY, INC., et al., Defendants-Appellees, _ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia _ (Opinion July 13, 1999, 180 F.3d 1244 , 11th Cir., 1999) (Ap
More
                                                              PUBLISH
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                       FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                   ________________________________
                                                          FILED
                    Nos. 97-8838, 97-9086 & 97-9269 COURT OF APPEALS
                                                   U.S.
                   ________________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                     D.C. Docket No. 94-01666-1-CV      APR 03 2000
                                                      THOMAS K. KAHN
                                                          CLERK
JOHN D. CHAPMAN,

                                       Plaintiff-Appellant,

      versus

AI TRANSPORT; AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL
ADJUSTMENT COMPANY, INC., et al.,

                                       Defendants-Appellees,

_________________________________________________________________

          Appeals from the United States District Court
               for the Northern District of Georgia

_________________________________________________________________

      (Opinion July 13, 1999, 
180 F.3d 1244
, 11th Cir., 1999)

                             (April 3, 2000)

Before ANDERSON, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT,   EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH,
DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.

B Y    T H E   C O U R T :

           A member of this court in active service having requested
a poll on the suggestion of rehearing en banc and a majority of the
judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of
granting a rehearing en banc,
           IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by
this court en banc.     The previous panel's opinion is hereby
VACATED.




                                2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer